Analyzing the dynamics of the US political campaigns, it is apparent how Donald Trump’s unique and noisy crude campaign puts him in the spotlight, a strategy that Kamala Harris is eager to use to her advantage.
Marked with characteristic flamboyancy and often crossing into uncharted territories of commonplace political dialogue, Donald Trump’s campaign strategies never fail to seize attention. He is renowned for taking a colorful, aggressive approach that makes the political arena appear like a reality TV show. His unconventionality renders his supporters staunchly loyal and his detractors firm in their opposition. However, this style also places him directly under the microscope, attracting intense scrutiny and criticism. The national and international media networks, the public, and his political competitors attentively watch his every move.
Enter Kamala Harris, then Democratic vice-presidential nominee, who was determined to use Trump’s noisy campaign style against him. Touted as a pragmatic and methodical politician, Harris exhibited a strategic approach that stands in stark contrast with Trump’s style. Rather than creating a spectacle, she focused on addressing the concerns of Americans and navigating the turbulence caused by the ongoing pandemic.
One of the crucial aspects of Harris’s strategy was highlighting the perceived inadequacies in the Trump administration’s handling of the COVID-19 crisis, using this scenario to tap into the simmering public disenchantment. Pointing out inconsistencies and perceived negligence in Trump’s campaign rhetoric about the pandemic, Harris sought to showcase a responsible and coherent alternative to the current management.
Additionally, the vice-presidential nominee leveraged her background as a former prosecutor to build a case against Trump’s handling of the racial injustices. Emphasizing on her viewpoint of racial equality and justice, Harris exploited the often-divisive nature of Trump’s commentary on such issues. By doing so, she not only set her campaign’s tone as the antithesis of Trump’s handling of racial issues but also struck a chord with those disheartened by the incumbent’s approach to the same.
As seen in her debate with Vice President Mike Pence, Harris demonstrated her capacity to challenge the Trump administration’s head-on, capitalizing on her experiences in political and legal forums. Her frequent resort to facts rather than flair enabled her to mount credible and powerful critiques of the Trump administration’s policy decisions, closing the gap between her and fellow citizens, and portraying a relatable and empathetic leadership figure.
In conclusion, while the approaches of Trump and Harris are intrinsically different, the former’s noisy crude style of campaign ended up becoming a focal point and tool for his political adversary to challenge his potential second term. This remarkable situation simply emphasizes the inherent unpredictability and dynamism of political campaigns.